Herramientas de Accesibilidad

LA UDES PUBLICA
Fecha de publicación:
2021-12-01
Tipo:
Article
Número de artículo:
289
Identificación:
SCOPUS_ID:85118530867
eID:
2-s2.0-85118530867
Nombre de la revista:
Systematic Reviews
Título del artículo:

Patient-important outcomes reported in randomized controlled trials of pharmacologic treatments for COVID-19: a protocol of a META-epidemiological study

Background: The coronavirus disease 19 (covid-19) pandemic has underscored the need to expedite clinical research, which may lead investigators to shift away from measuring patient-important outcomes (PIO), limiting research applicability. We aim to investigate if randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of covid-19 pharmacological therapies include PIOs. Methods: We will perform a meta-epidemiological study of RCTs that included people at risk for, or with suspected, probable, or confirmed covid-19, examining any pharmacological treatment or blood product aimed at prophylaxis or treatment. We will obtain data from all RCTs identified in a living network metanalysis (NMA). The main data sources are the living WHO covid-19 database up to 1 March 2021 and six additional Chinese databases up to 20 February 2021. Two reviewers independently will review each citation, full-text article, and abstract data. To categorize the outcomes according to their importance to patients, we will adapt a previously defined hierarchy: a) mortality, b) quality of life/ functional status/symptoms, c) morbidity, and d) surrogate outcomes. Outcomes within the category a) and b) will be considered critically important to patients, and outcomes within the category c) will be regarded as important. We will use descriptive statistics to assess the proportion of studies that report each category of outcomes. We will perform univariable and multivariable analysis to explore associations between trial characteristics and the likelihood of reporting PIOs. Discussion: The findings from this meta-epidemiological study will help health care professionals and researchers understand if the current covid-19 trials are effectively assessing and reporting the outcomes that are important to patients. If a deficiency in capturing PIOs is identified, this information may help inform the development of future RCTs in covid-19. Systematic review registrations: Open Science Framework registration: osf.io/6xgjz.

Autor(es) UDES:
Angarita-Fonseca A.
Otros Autores:
Jimenez-Mora M.A., Varela A.R., Meneses-Echavez J.F., Bidonde J., Siemieniuk R.A.C., Zeraatkar D., Bartoszko J.J., Brignardello-Petersen R., Honarmand K., Rochwerg B., Guyatt G., Yepes-Nuñez J.J.
Autor Principal:
Jimenez-Mora M.A.
Áreas del conocimiento:
Medicine (miscellaneous)
Acerca de la revista donde se publicó este artículo:

Systematic Reviews

Cuartil Q1
Ranking
2829
Tipo
Journal
eISSN
20464053
Región
Western Europe
País
United Kingdom
Volumen
10
Cobertura
2002, 2005-2010, 2012-2022
Logo o escudo de Universidad de Santander UDES - Con acreditación de Alta Calidad (Bucaramanga)
Servicios
Sistema Génesis Sistema GALILEO Directorio Telefónico Chat en línea